JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (2008) 198, 135-145    DOI: 10.1677/JOE-07-0627
© 2008 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
JOE-07-0627v1
198/1/135    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scrimgeour, K
Right arrow Articles by Newman, R E
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scrimgeour, K
Right arrow Articles by Newman, R E

Ghrelin secretion is more closely aligned to energy balance than with feeding behaviour in the grower pig

K Scrimgeour, M J Gresham, L R Giles1, P C Thomson, P C Wynn and R E Newman

Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales 2570, Australia1 Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Camden, New South Wales 2570, Australia

(Correspondence should be addressed to R E Newman; Email: ronaldn{at}camden.usyd.edu.au)

Secretory characteristics of the ghrelin profile for the pig are still unknown. Our objective was to clarify the mechanisms that influence ghrelin secretion during differing feeding patterns. Pigs were initially fed a commercial pelleted diet offered ad libitum and blood samples collected for 24 h at intervals of 1 h. The pigs were then entrained for 17 days to a twice daily interval feeding regimen (0900–1000 and 1600–1700 h) and blood samples were collected for 12 h (0800–2000 h). This was followed by a similar interval feeding and blood sampling regimen with the 0900–1000 h feeding period being replaced by a sham feed where pigs were shown their usual feed but none offered. During the ad libitum feeding regimen, there was no preprandial rise or postprandial fall in circulating plasma total ghrelin concentration, which remained constant throughout the sampling period. In addition, no preprandial rise or postprandial fall in ghrelin concentrations was observed when pigs were fed either twice or once daily; however, plasma ghrelin concentration rose gradually over the 12-h sampling period during the twice daily feeding regimen and increased further when pigs were fed once per day. This increase in ghrelin levels coincided with an increase in plasma GH and non-esterified fatty acid concentrations and was not associated with either plasma glucose or insulin concentrations. These results suggest that circulating total plasma ghrelin concentrations in the pig appear to be influenced by chronic changes in energy balance rather than the feeding pattern per se.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Endocrinology.