|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Physiology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan2 Department of Physiology, College of Basic Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, People's Republic of China
(Correspondence should be addressed to J Arita; Email: jarita{at}yamanashi.ac.jp)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adenovirus infection and gene transfer in vitro also interfere with specific cell functions in cultured cells. Adenovirus vectors enhance cell survival and inhibit apoptosis in endothelial (Ramalingam et al. 1999, Zhang et al. 2004) and lung epithelial cells in culture (Flaherty et al. 2004). However, the effect of adenovirus vector infection is poorly understood in endocrine cells. Castro et al. (1997) reported that infection of the primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells with an adenovirus expressing β-galactosidase (βgal), at multiplicities of infection (MOIs) up to 5, did not affect hormone secretion. However, infection at a MOI of 20 increased basal secretion and conversely decreased secretagogue-stimulated secretion of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and luteinizing hormone. Adenoviruses expressing green fluorescent protein and βgal also increased the basal secretion of adrenocortical steroids such as cortisol, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, and 11-deoxycortisol and decreased their ACTH-stimulated secretion in bovine adrenocortical cells in the primary culture (Alesci et al. 2002). In association with the increase in basal hormone secretion, an increase in [3H]thymidine uptake is observed in adenovirus-infected cells, suggesting that the increased basal secretion by adenoviruses is caused by an increased cell number.
Understanding how adenovirus vectors interfere with specific cell functions and intracellular signaling will assist with designing experiments that use these vectors appropriately. Additionally, knowing the limitations of adenovirus vectors will aid with correctly interpreting experimental data. Therefore, in this study, we used the rat pituitary lactotroph in the primary culture as a model for studying how adenovirus vector infection modulates cell proliferation. We found that the first-generation E1/E3-deleted adenovirus vectors differentially modulated lactotroph proliferation in a mitogen and infection time-dependent manner. In addition, we measured the activities of mitogen signaling pathways in adenovirus-infected cells and correlated them with changes in cell proliferation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adenovirus vectors were produced using the Adeno-X Expression and Adeno-X Tet-On Expression Systems according to the manufacturer's protocol (Clontech Laboratories). The adenovirus vector Ad-βgal, which expresses βgal under the control of the human cytomegalovirus immediate early gene (CMV) promoter, was purchased from Clontech Laboratories. Ad-Tet.On, an adenovirus expressing CMV-driven rTetR-VP16, and Ad-TRE/βgal, an adenovirus expressing βgal in a tetracycline-regulated manner, have been described in detail previously (Ishida et al. 2007a). An adenovirus expressing firefly luciferase driven by the CMV promoter (Ad-luc) was produced by inserting luciferase cDNA of pGL3-Basic into the NheI/XbaI sites in the pShuttle vector. To produce an adenovirus carrying the rat prolactin (PRL) promoter but no cDNA for exogenous proteins (Ad-emp), a pGL3 vector containing a 3.2-kb fragment of the rat PRL promoter (Ishida et al. 2007b) was digested with HindIII and XbaI to delete luciferase cDNA and then cloned into the NotI/BamHI sites in pTRE-Shuttle2-NruI.MCS.SmaI (Ishida et al. 2007a). These modified pShuttle and pTRE-Shuttle2 vectors were digested with I-CeuI and PI-SceI, and the genes of interest were inserted into a site created with the same restriction enzymes in Adeno-X viral DNA, a replication-defective adenoviral genome. Adeno-X viral DNA was transfected into HEK293 cells using the FuGene 6 Transfection Reagent (Roche Diagnostics) for virus production, and the recombinant adenoviruses were further propagated by serial infection in HEK293 cells. The adenoviruses obtained were purified with the Adeno-X virus purification kit (Clontech Laboratories) and concentrated with the Centricon Centrifugal Filter Unit (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Adenovirus vector titers (infectious units, ifu) were determined using the Adeno-X Rapid Titer Kit (Clontech Laboratories).
Cell culture and viral infection
Experiments were approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experiments of the University of Yamanashi. Seven-week-old female Wistar rats, purchased from Japan SLC (Shizuoka, Japan), were used to obtain anterior pituitary cells for the primary culture. Anterior pituitary cells were dispersed as described previously (Kawashima et al. 2002). A 100 µl aliquot of a cell suspension containing 2.0x105 pituitary cells was combined with the adenovirus vectors at appropriate MOIs in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM) and Ham's Nutrient Mix F-12 without phenol red, containing 15 mM HEPES, penicillin, and streptomycin (DMEM/F12). The cells were then plated in poly-D-lysine-coated 35 mm culture dishes. The cells were then subsequently allowed to attach to the surface of the dishes in a humidified CO2 incubator for 1 h. The pituitary cells were then flooded with 2 ml DMEM/F12 containing 500 ng/ml insulin and precultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air for 1 day. After 1 day of preculture, the pituitary cells were washed with DMEM/F12 to remove adenoviruses and cultures were initiated with a serum-free, chemically defined medium (Kawashima et al. 2002). In experiments using Ad-TRE/βgal and Ad-Tet.On, doxycycline was added at a concentration of 10 µg/ml to induce the reverse Tet repressor protein and thereby βgal protein. Cultured pituitary cells were treated with the following mitogens: forskolin (1 µM), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I; 30 ng/ml), bromocriptine (10 nM), 17β-estradiol (E2; 1 nM), fetal bovine serum (FBS; 5%), and dextran-coated charcoal-striped (DCC) horse serum (10%). For labeling proliferating pituitary cells, the cultured cells were treated with 200 µM 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) for 3 h prior to the end of culture.
Immunostaining
To determine the BrdU-labeling index, pituitary cells labeled with BrdU were detached from culture dishes at the end of culture by trypsin treatment. The cells were attached to poly-D-lysine-coated glass slides by centrifugation using a cytocentrifuge and fixed with ice-cold methanol. The pituitary cells, attached to glass slides, were double immunostained for BrdU and PRL as described previously (Kawashima et al. 2002). Immunostained slides were covered with PermaFluor (Immunon, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and examined using a fluorescence microscope equipped with a dual-band mirror unit for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and Texas Red. A total of 1000 PRL-immunoreactive cells were examined in randomly chosen fields for each slide to determine the BrdU-labeling index, which was the percentage of cells immunoreactive for both PRL and BrdU of the total PRL-immunoreactive cells counted.
For double immunostaining for phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (pCREB) and PRL, the pituitary cells cultured on dishes were fixed with paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with TBS containing 1% Tween 20 and treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide. After blocking nonspecific binding by using a blocking reagent supplied in the tyramide signal amplification (TSA) fluorescence system (Perkin–Elmer, Boston, MA, USA), the pituitary cells were immunostained for pCREB and PRL as described previously (Ishida et al. 2007a). Fluorescence images of pCREB and PRL labeled with FITC-tyramide and AlexaFluor 594 respectively were captured with a digital CCD camera and stored in a personal computer. The pCREB immunoreactivity was quantified by measuring the fluorescence intensity of nuclear FITC with Photoshop imaging software (Adobe Systems), and a cell with a fluorescence intensity higher than a level of 60–85 was defined as a pCREB-immunoreactive cell. The pituitary cells immunoreactive for both pCREB and PRL were counted in a total of 200 PRL-immunoreactive cells.
βgal histochemistry
Pituitary cells cultured on dishes were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 10 min and rinsed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST). The pituitary cells were permeabilized with TBS containing 1% Tween 20 for 30 min and incubated with PBS containing 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 2 mM MgCl2, and 1 mg/ml X-gal at 37 °C for 1 h.
Immunoblotting
The pituitary cells, cultured at a cell number of 9x105 cells/35 mm dish, were lysed with 100 µl ice-cold lysis buffer composed of 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and protease inhibitor cocktail (aprotinin, bestatin, leupeptin, and pepstatin A) (sc-24948, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 15 min at 4 °C. The cell lysates were placed on ice for 30 min in microcentrifuge tubes and vortexed every 10 min, and whole-cell extract of soluble protein was obtained by centrifugation at 17 500 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration of the supernatants was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). The supernatant aliquots containing equal amounts of total protein (5–20 µg) were denatured in 2x sample buffer composed of 125 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 10% glycerol, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.2% bromophenol blue for 5 min at 99 °C and electrophoresed on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Separated proteins were transferred to the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Hybond-P; Amersham Biosciences). The membrane was blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST and then incubated with primary antibodies in TBST containing 5% BSA at 4 °C overnight. The primary antibodies were labeled for 1 h with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or mouse IgG antibody (Amersham Biosciences; 1:10 000 dilution in TBST). The membrane was reacted with the reagent included with the ECL plus western blotting detection system (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the signal was detected with a luminoimage analyzer (LAS-1000 plus, Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan). The primary antibodies used were as follows: anti-cyclin D1 (SC-6281; 1:300 dilution) purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, anti-pCREB (Ser133) (#9198) (1:500 dilution), anti-phosphorylated p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (#9101) (1:2000 dilution), anti-AKT (#9272) (1:2000 dilution), and anti-phosphorylated AKT (Ser473) (#9271) (1:500 dilution) from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA), anti-ERK1 (#610030) (1:4000 dilution) from Becton Dickinson Biosciences (Bedford, MA), anti-CREB (#238461) (1:1000 dilution) from Calbiochem-EMD Chemicals (Darmstadt, Germany), and anti-β-actin (A-5441) (1:10 000 dilution) from Sigma.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Expression levels of mRNAs for estrogen-responsive genes were determined by qRT-PCR as described previously (Ishida et al. 2007a). Total pituitary RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Qiagen). RNA was reverse transcribed using an oligo (dT)20 primer and ReverTra Ace reverse transcriptase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Reverse transcriptase reactions were amplified on an ABI Prism 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the SYBR Green Real-Time PCR Kit (Toyobo). The primers used are shown in Table 1. The mRNA levels were calculated by the
method using acid ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 (Arbp) as an endogenous reference. The fold change in gene expression of the estradiol treated group was determined relative to the vehicle-treated control in each experiment, and the mean of the fold changes obtained from three independent experiments was then calculated.
|
Experiments were replicated at least three times with separate batches of cell preparations. Differences between groups were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's protected least significant difference test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability of adenoviruses to express exogenous protein was verified in the primary cultures of the anterior pituitary cells using βgal histochemistry. After a 3-day infection at an MOI of 5 with Ad-βgal, an adenovirus vector encoding the βgal gene downstream of the CMV promoter, many cells exhibited βgal activity (Fig. 1A and B). The βgal activity was also seen when cells were co-infected with Ad-Tet.On and Ad-TRE/βgal, an adenovirus encoding the βgal gene downstream of the tetracycline-responsive expression cassette and treated with the tetracycline analog doxycycline (Fig. 1C).
|
|
|
Adenovirus vector modulation of lactotroph proliferation via viral proteins and nonspecific transgene proteins
To examine whether the changes in lactotroph proliferation caused by Ad-βgal and Ad-TRE/βgal+Ad-Tet.On were due to either a specific effect of βgal, a common effect of expressed exogenous proteins, or an effect of adenovirus-derived proteins, we measured lactotroph proliferation in cells infected with Ad-luc, an adenovirus carrying the luciferase gene instead of the βgal gene, and Ad-emp, an adenovirus expressing no exogenous protein. An increase in basal proliferation as observed in Ad-βgal or Ad-TRE/βgal+Ad-Tet.On-infected cells was also seen in Ad-luc- or Ad-emp-infected cells (P<0.05; Fig. 4A). Like Ad-βgal and Ad-TRE/βgal+Ad-Tet.On, both Ad-luc and Ad-emp blocked the stimulatory action of E2 in the presence of DCC serum or forskolin (P<0.05) (Fig. 4A and B). However, FBS-induced proliferation was lost in Ad-luc-infected cells (P<0.05) but not in Ad-emp-infected cells (Fig. 4C).
|
In the above-mentioned experiments, adenoviruses were infected for 3 days to determine their effect on lactotroph proliferation. We next asked whether the modulation of proliferation by adenovirus infection was a function of infection time. Time-course studies revealed that the increase in basal proliferation by Ad-βgal or Ad-TRE/βgal+Ad-Tet.On peaked at 3 days after infection and was lost at 5 days, indicating a transient effect on basal proliferation (Fig. 5A). In addition, the blockade of FBS-induced proliferation by these adenoviruses observed at 3 days after infection was also lost at 5 days (Fig. 5B). FBS induced a dramatic proliferative effect in adenovirus-infected cells at this time point (P<0.05). By contrast, the blockade of the stimulatory action of E2 in the presence of forskolin by Ad-βgal or Ad-TRE/βgal+Ad-Tet.On persisted even at 5 days after infection (P<0.05; Fig. 5C).
|
We next determined whether the increased basal proliferation of lactotrophs caused by adenovirus infection was accompanied by changes in the activities of mitogenic signaling pathways in Ad-βgal- and Ad-emp-infected cells. The western blot analysis revealed that expression levels of cyclin D1 protein were increased in these adenovirus-infected cells (Fig. 6A), consistent with the results on proliferation as determined by BrdU labeling. Phosphorylated forms of CREB and ERK1/2 also showed an increase in Ad-βgal or Ad-emp-infected cells compared with uninfected cells while CREB and ERK1 were not changed in either group. There was a modest increase in the expression level of phosphorylated AKT. Because it was possible that the change in pCREB in cell lysates from total pituitary cell populations as determined by western blotting did not necessarily correctly reflect a change in lactotrophs, we determined lactotroph-specific CREB activation in adenovirus-infected cells using quantitative double immunostaining for pCREB and PRL (Ishida et al. 2007a). The percentage of pCREB-immunoreactive lactotrophs was markedly increased by forskolin as a positive control in uninfected cells (P<0.05; Fig. 6B). Infection with Ad-βgal or Ad-emp significantly increased the percentage of pCREB-immunoreactive lactotrophs in vehicle-treated cells (P<0.05).
|
The differential modulation by adenovirus vector infection of the stimulatory and inhibitory actions of estrogen on lactotroph proliferation may be accompanied by changes in the response of estrogen-responsive genes to estrogen. We therefore determined E2-induced mRNA expression levels of estrogen-responsive genes in Ad-βgal- and Ad-emp-infected cells. The estrogen-responsive genes were chosen on the basis of the results in preliminary studies and included the estrogen-upregulated genes Pim3, Stat5, and c-myc and the estrogen-downregulated genes Plagl1 and Serpine1. The E2 responsiveness in their mRNA expression levels were verified in uninfected cells (Fig. 7). E2-induced fold changes in mRNA levels of Pim3 and Plagl1 were not altered by either Ad-emp or Ad-βgal infection (P>0.05). Both adenovirus vectors markedly enhanced the E2 responsiveness of Stat5a mRNA (P<0.05) while they attenuated the responsiveness of Serpine1 and c-myc mRNAs (P<0.05).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is possible that the modulation of lactotroph proliferation, observed in cells infected with adenovirus vectors expressing βgal, is due to a specific effect of βgal expression, a nonspecific effect of exogenous protein expression by the transferred gene, or an effect of adenovirus-derived proteins. We addressed this possibility by using Ad-luc and Ad-emp. Modulation of basal proliferation and proliferation stimulated by estrogen in combination with DCC serum or forskolin, as observed in βgal-expressing adenovirus vector-infected cells, was also seen by infection with Ad-luc and Ad-emp. These results indicate that the viral proteins and not the transgene proteins are responsible for these changes. By contrast, the blockade of FBS-stimulated proliferation was seen following infection with Ad-luc but not with Ad-emp, indicating that the FBS action on lactotroph proliferation is blocked by the expression of an exogenous transgene protein. This study yielded three key observations. First, adenovirus infection modulates mitogen-induced proliferation in a mitogen-dependent manner. Secondly, adenovirus-mediated modulations are caused by both adenovirus-derived proteins and exogenous transgene proteins. Finally, a time course exists for modulation of mitogen activity following adenovirus infection, as exemplified by the difference in the persistence of the changes in basal and estrogen-stimulated proliferation. These findings suggest that the adenovirus-mediated modulation of lactotroph proliferation involves a complicated, multi-factorial mechanism.
The identities of the adenovirus-derived proteins that are responsible for the modulation of increased basal proliferation and estrogen-stimulated proliferation are currently undetermined. Adenoviruses have many genes that are capable of promoting transformation, cell proliferation, and transcriptional activity in infected cells (Leppard 1997). An E4 gene product, the E4-orf6/7 protein, may be responsible for the increased basal proliferation of lactotrophs. This is likely because the adenovirus vectors used in this study are human adenovirus serotype 5 with deletions of the early genes E1 and E3. Transcription of E2F-1, a member of the E2F transcription factor family that plays a pivotal role in the regulation of cell proliferation (Stevens & La Thangue 2003) is positively regulated by E2Fs themselves (Hsiao et al. 1994, Johnson et al. 1994). Schaley et al. (2000) have shown that E4-orf6/7 interacts directly with a heterodimer consisting of E2F and the DP protein and induces the binding of E2F to the E2F-1 promoter in infected cells. This leads to stimulation of E2F-1 promoter activity and protein expression. Thus, E4-orf6/7 may stimulate basal proliferation of lactotrophs via E2F induction.
We observed that the increased basal proliferation of lactotrophs by Ad-emp or Ad-βgal was accompanied by increased basal levels of phosphorylated CREB and ERK in pituitary cells. Additionally, the result of a greater proportion of pCREB-immunoreactive lactotrophs, demonstrated by double immunostaining for pCREB and PRL, verifies that pCREB is increased in lactotrophs. Furthermore, the elevated pCREB is not due to an increase in cell number resulting from increased basal proliferation, but to more pCREB per cell. Consistent with these findings, protein kinase A activity and CREB binding in human umbilical vein endothelial cells are stimulated by a βgal-expressing adenovirus vector (Zhang et al. 2005). ERK is activated by adenovirus vectors in a kidney-derived epithelial cell line (Tibbles et al. 2002) and lung epithelial cells (Flaherty et al. 2004). Both the protein kinase A/CREB and ERK signaling pathways are implicated in the regulation of lactotroph proliferation (Suzuki et al. 1999, Fernández et al. 2003, Yamakawa & Arita 2004, Chaturvedi & Sarkar 2005, Ishida et al. 2007a). Thus, CREB and ERK activation are likely to be involved in the increased basal proliferation induced by adenovirus vectors, although it is unknown whether the relationship is parallel or causal.
Estrogen regulates both normal and cancer cell proliferation in estrogen-responsive tissues via estrogen receptor-mediated expression of genes that regulate cell proliferation (Weisz & Bresciani 1993, Dickson & Lippman 1995). We investigated whether the influence of adenovirus vectors on estrogen effects was mediated by a change in the response to estrogen of estrogen-responsive genes. We measured, in adenovirus-infected cells, E2-induced expression levels of various estrogen-responsive pituitary cell genes that regulate proliferation (Hennighausen et al. 1997, Obaya et al. 1999, Deneen et al. 2003, Durand et al. 2004, Abdollahi 2007). The E2 responsiveness of mRNA levels of the estrogen-upregulated gene Pim3 and the estrogen-downregulated gene Plagl1 was not altered by adenovirus vectors, the response of the upregulated gene c-myc and downregulated gene Serpine1 was attenuated, and that of Stat5a was enhanced. These results are the first to demonstrate changes in expression of estrogen-responsive genes by adenovirus vector infection. In addition, they suggest that the differential response of the stimulatory and inhibitory actions of estrogen to adenovirus infection is caused by differences in the response to adenovirus vectors among the various estrogen-responsive genes.
Adenovirus vectors are a promising means for gene transfer in normal cells in the primary culture. Ideally, the viral vector by itself should not affect the function of the target cells. We have shown in this study that adenovirus vectors modulate proliferation of pituitary lactotrophs in the primary culture more extensively than was originally thought. The modulation is dependent both on the mitogen and the infection time. The effects result both from viral proteins and delivered gene products. Because interfering modulation by adenovirus vectors may confound the results of experiments using them, a complete understanding of the interactions between adenovirus vectors and target cells is critical to the successful application of adenovirus vectors as gene transfer tools.
| Declaration of Interest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Funding |
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alesci S, Ramsey WJ, Bornstein SR, Chrousos GP, Hornsby PJ, Benvenga S, Trimarchi F & Ehrhart-Bornstein M 2002 Adenoviral vectors can impair adrenocortical steroidogenesis: clinical implications for natural infections and gene therapy. PNAS 99 7484–7489.
Ben-Jonathan N & Hnasko R 2001 Dopamine as a prolactin (PRL) inhibitor. Endocrine Reviews 22 724–763.
Castro MG, Goya RG, Sosa YE, Rowe J, Larregina A, Morelli A & Löwenstein PR 1997 Expression of transgenes in normal and neoplastic anterior pituitary cells using recombinant adenoviruses: long term expression, cell cycle dependency, and effects on hormone secretion. Endocrinology 138 2184–2194.
Chaturvedi K & Sarkar DK 2005 Mediation of basic fibroblast growth factor-induced lactotropic cell proliferation by Src-Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase p44/42 signaling. Endocrinology 146 1948–1955.
Chirmule N, Hughes JV, Gao G, Raper SE & Wilson JM 1998 Role of E4 in eliciting CD4 T-cell and B-cell responses to adenovirus vectors delivered to murine and nonhuman primate lungs. Journal of Virology 72 6138–6145.
Crystal RG, McElvaney NG, Rosenfeld MA, Chu C, Mastrangeli A, Hay JG, Brody SL, Jaffe HA, Eissa T & Danel C 1994 Administration of an adenovirus containing the human CFTR cDNA to the respiratory tract of individuals with cystic fibrosis. Nature Genetics 8 42–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Dai Y, Schwarz EM, Gu D, Zhang W, Sarvetnick N & Verma IM 1995 Cellular and humoral immune responses to adenoviral vectors containing factor IX gene: tolerization of factor IX and vector antigens allows for long-term expression. PNAS 92 1401–1405.
Deneen B, Welford SM, Ho T, Hernandez F, Kurland I & Denny CT 2003 PIM3 proto-oncogene kinase is a common transcriptional target of divergent EWS/ETS oncoproteins. Molecular and Cellular Biology 23 3897–3908.
Dickson RB & Lippman ME 1995 Growth factors in breast cancer. Endocrine Reviews 16 559–589.
Durand MK, Bodker JS, Christensen A, Dupont DM, Hansen M, Jensen JK, Kjelgaard S, Mathiasen L, Pedersen KE, Skeldal S et al. 2004 Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 91 438–449.[Web of Science][Medline]
Fernández M, Sánchez-Franco F, Palacios N, Sánchez I, Villluendas G & Cacicedo L 2003 Involvement of vasoactive intestinal peptide on insulin-like growth factor I-induced proliferation of rat pituitary lactotropes in primary culture: evidence for an autocrine and/or paracrine regulatory system. Neuroendocrinology 77 341–352.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Flaherty DM, Hinde SL, Monick MM, Powers LS, Bradford MA, Yarovinsky T & Hunninghake GW 2004 Adenovirus vectors activate survival pathways in lung epithelial cells. American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 287 L393–L401.
Hennighausen L, Robinson GW, Wagner KU & Liu X 1997 Developing a mammary gland is a stat affair. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 2 365–372.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hsiao KM, McMahon SL & Farnham PJ 1994 Multiple DNA elements are required for the growth regulation of the mouse E2F1 promoter. Genes and Development 8 1526–1537.
Ishida M, Mitsui T, Yamakawa K, Sugiyama N, Takahashi W, Shimura H, Endo T, Kobayashi T & Arita J 2007a Involvement of cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate response element-binding protein in the regulation of cell proliferation and the prolactin promoter of lactotrophs in primary culture. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 293 E1529–E1537.
Ishida M, Takahashi W, Itoh S, Shimodaira S, Maeda S & Arita J 2007b Estrogen actions on lactotroph proliferation are independent of a paracrine interaction with other pituitary cell types: a study using lactotroph-enriched cells. Endocrinology 148 3131–3139.
Johnson DG, Ohtani K & Nevins JR 1994 Autoregulatory control of E2F1 expression in response to positive and negative regulators of cell cycle progression. Genes and Development 8 1514–1525.
Kawashima K, Yamakawa K, Takahashi W, Takizawa S, Yin P, Sugiyama N, Kanba S & Arita J 2002 The estrogen-occupied estrogen receptor functions as a negative regulator to inhibit cell proliferation induced by insulin/IGF-1: a cell context-specific antimitogenic action of estradiol on rat lactotrophs in culture. Endocrinology 143 2750–2758.
Lee EJ, Anderson LM, Thimmapaya B & Jameson JL 1999 Targeted expression of toxic genes directed by pituitary hormone promoters: a potential strategy for adenovirus-mediated gene therapy of pituitary tumors. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 84 786–794.
Lee EJ, Rachel W, Kotlar T & Jameson JL 2001 Restoration of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) responsiveness in pituitary GH3 cells by adenovirus-directed expression of the human GHRH receptor. Endocrinology 142 414–420.
Leppard KN 1997 E4 gene function in adenovirus, adenovirus vector and adeno-associated virus infections. Journal of General Virology 78 2131–2138.[Web of Science][Medline]
Lieber A, He CY & Kay MA 1997a Adenoviral preterminal protein stabilizes mini-adenoviral genomes in vitro and in vivo. Nature Biotechnology 15 1383–1387.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lieber A, He C, Meuse L, Schowalter D, Kirillova I, Winther B & Kay MA 1997b The role of Kupffer cell activation and viral gene expression in early liver toxicity after infusion of recombinant adenovirus vectors. Journal of Virology 71 8798–8807.[Abstract]
Neill JD, Musgrove LC, Duck LW & Sellers JC 1999 High efficiency method for gene transfer in normal pituitary gonadotropes: adenoviral-mediated expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 suppresses luteinizing hormone secretion. Endocrinology 140 2562–2569.
Obaya AJ, Mateyak MK & Sedivy JM 1999 Mysterious liaisons: the relationship between c-Myc and the cell cycle. Oncogene 18 2934–2941.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ramalingam R, Rafii S, Worgall S, Brough DE & Crystal RG 1999 E1(–)E4(+) adenoviral gene transfer vectors function as a pro-life signal to promote survival of primary human endothelial cells. Blood 93 2936–2944.
Schaley J, OConnor RJ, Taylor LJ, Bar-Sagi D & Hearing P 2000 Induction of the cellular E2F-1 promoter by the adenovirus E4-6/7 protein. Journal of Virology 74 2084–2093.
Seth P 2000 Adenoviral vectors. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 465 13–22.[Web of Science][Medline]
Smith-Arica JR, Williams JC, Stone D, Smith J, Löwenstein PR & Castro MG 2001 Switching on and off transgene expression within lactotrophic cells in the anterior pituitary gland in vivo. Endocrinology 142 2521–2532.
Southgate TD, Windeatt S, Smith-Arica J, Gerdes CA, Perone MJ, Morris I, Davis JRE, Klatzmann D, Löwenstein PR & Castro MG 2000 Transcriptional targeting to anterior pituitary lactotrophic cells using recombinant adenovirus vectors in vitro and in vivo in normal and estrogen/sulpiride-induced hyperplastic anterior pituitaries. Endocrinology 141 3493–3505.
Stevens C & La Thangue NB 2003 E2F and cell cycle control: a double-edged sword. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 412 157–169.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Suzuki S, Yamamoto I & Arita J 1999 Mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent stimulation of proliferation of rat lactotrophs in culture by 3', 5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Endocrinology 140 2850–2858.
Tibbles LA, Spurrell JCL, Bowen GP, Liu Q, Lam M, Zaiss AK, Robbins SM, Hollenberg MD, Wickham TJ & Muruve DA 2002 Activation of p38 and ERK signaling during adenovirus vector cell entry lead to expression of the C-X-C chemokine IP-10. Journal of Virology 76 1559–1568.
Weisz A & Bresciani F 1993 Estrogen regulation of proto-oncogenes coding for nuclear proteins. Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis 4 361–388.[Web of Science][Medline]
Yamakawa K & Arita J 2004 Cross talk between the estrogen receptor-, protein kinase A-, and mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated signaling pathways in the regulation of lactotroph proliferation in primary culture. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 88 123–130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yang Y, Xiang Z, Ertl HCJ & Wilson JM 1995 Upregulation of class I major histocompatibility complex antigens by interferon
is necessary for T-cell-mediated elimination of recombinant adenovirus-infected hepatocytes in vivo. PNAS 92 7257–7261.
Yeh P & Perricaudet M 1997 Advances in adenoviral vectors: from genetic engineering to their biology. FASEB Journal 11 615–623.[Abstract]
Zhang F, Cheng J, Hackett NR, Lam G, Shido K, Pergolizzi R, Jin DK, Crystal RG & Rafii S 2004 Adenovirus E4 gene promotes selective endothelial cell survival and angiogenesis via activation of the vascular endothelial-cadherin/Akt signaling pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279 11760–11766.
Zhang F, Cheng J, Lam G, Jin DK, Vincent L, Hackett NR, Wang S, Young LM, Hempstead B, Crystal RG et al. 2005 Adenovirus vector E4 gene regulates connexin 40 and 43 expression in endothelial cells via PKA and PI3K signal pathways. Circulation Research 96 950–957.
Received in final form 7 April 2008
Accepted 11 April 2008
Made available online as an Accepted Preprint 11 April 2008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |