|
|
||||||||
Departamento de Biología de la Reproducción, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Vasco de Quiroga # 15 Tlalpan, 14000 México DF, Mexico1 Departamento de Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 04510, México DF, Mexico2 MEXFAM A.C. Juárez 208 Tlalpan, 14000 México DF, Mexico
(Correspondence should be addressed to A Morales; Email: amorales{at}quetzal.innsz.mx)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal procedures were carried out in accordance with the Official Mexican Guideline for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) and approved by the Institutional Research Committee. Animals were housed under controlled conditions of temperature (24–26 °C), humidity (30–50%) and 12 h light:12 h darkness cycles, with access to water and standard rodent chow made available ad libitum until killing.
Experimental groups
Fifty adult male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus; 200–250 g) were divided into five groups of five rats each, in two independent experiments: 1) intact; 2) castrated; 3–5) castrated and substituted with testosterone enanthate (TE; Shering Mexicana, Mexico City, Mexico) and killed 3, 5, or 7 days post-treatment respectively. Gonadectomy was performed under ketamine–xylazine anesthesia, a single cutaneous incision was made through the scrotal sac and the peritoneal cavity was entered to expose the testes. The testicular bundles were double ligated with 4-0 silk suture and the testes removed. The cutaneous incision was closed with 5-0 silk suture.
Treatments
Three days after gonadectomy, the animals from group 2 received an i.m. injection of 500 µl vehicle (corn oil), whereas animals of groups 3, 4, and 5 were injected with TE (20 mg/kg body weight) in a single dose. Rats from groups 2 and 3 were killed 3 days after the injection, whereas rats from groups 4 and 5 after 5 and 7 days respectively.
Testosterone quantification
The levels of testosterone were determined in rat serum samples by specific RIA using commercial kits (Diagnostic Product Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The sensitivity limit of the RIA was 2.47 pg/ml, the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 4.9 and 8.2% respectively.
RNA isolation and qPCR analysis
In order to achieve optimal relative expression results, for the in vivo studies all comparisons were made starting with same mass of tissue, which corresponded to pancreatic tail. Total RNA was extracted from pancreas immediately after resection by homogenizing in Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). For the in vitro studies, plates containing insulinoma cells were scrapped using a sterile rubber policeman with 1 ml Trizol reagent. In all cases, the amount and quality of RNA were estimated spectrophotometrically at 260/280 nm and a constant amount of RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed using the transcriptor RT system (Roche Applied Science). Primers and probes were designed by Roche Universal ProbeLibrary Assay Design Center (https://qpcr2.probefinder.com/organism.jsp). The primer pairs were targeted to the genes coding for rat EG-VEGF and β-actin. Sequences used were as follows: EG-VEGF, GGCTGTGTACCCCTCTGG and CGTTTCCTAAAGAAAGGGATCTT and β-actin, TGCCCTAGACTTCGAGCAAG and GGCAGCTCATAGGCTCTTETCC. The sizes of the resulting amplicons were 76 and 72 nucleotides, and the probes utilized were 12 and 69 from the Universal Probe Library (Roche) for EG-VEGF and β-actin respectively. Afterward, identical qPCR conditions were performed and normalization was achieved in all cases by comparing our gene of interest against the housekeeping gene β-actin. Real-time PCRs were carried out using the LightCycler 2.0 (Roche), according to the following protocol: activation of Taq DNA polymerase and DNA denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, proceeded by 45 amplification cycles consisting of 10 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 1 s at 72 °C. In order to facilitate comparisons among different experiments, all samples were compared with the intra-experiment calibrator. The calibrator was used for normalization of the final results, and for each experiment performed the calibrator was either the control group of rats (intact animals) or the vehicle-treated cells, and these values were arbitrarily given a value of 1. PCR efficiency was determined by a standard curve for each set of primers. After confirmation of linearity, both PCR efficiencies were near 2.
Insulinoma cell line
The immortalized rat insulinoma cell line (RINm5F) was a generous gift from Dr Marcia Hiriat (Instituto de Fisiología Celular UNAM, Mexico). Cells were maintained in culture with RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 2 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 2.4 g/l HEPES, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin and 0.25 mg/ml fungizone (all from Invitrogen) at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2–95% atmospheric air. Experiments were performed in serum-free medium, and in all cases the cells were grown to 75% confluence. The cells were incubated in the presence of different testosterone concentrations (1x10–11–1x10–8 M) for 24 h. The flutamide dose used in our studies was 1x10–7 M. After culture, the cells were processed with 1 ml Trizol reagent for RNA extraction, as described previously.
Immunohistochemistry procedure
A fragment of each pancreatic tissue was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin according to conventional procedures. Tissue sections (7 µm thick) placed on poly-L-lysine-coated slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol solutions. The sections were blocked in 10% normal serum diluted in PBS with 1% (w/v) BSA (Sigma Chemical) for 60 min. After washing with PBS, each section was incubated with goat polyclonal IgG-EG-VEGF antibody (1:300, cat. sc-30343; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight at 4 °C. Afterward the sections were incubated with a second rhodamine-conjugated chicken anti-goat IgG antibody (1:100, cat. sc-2860; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) for 60 min at room temperature. Finally, the sections were washed and coverslipped with non-fade aqueous mounting medium (Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Digitalized images of the same microscopic field were captured with specific filters for rhodamine. Double immunohistochemistry staining was performed in RINm5F. Cells were permeabilized and subsequently incubated overnight with goat polyclonal IgG-EG-VEGF antibody (1:300, cat. sc-30343; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc). Subsequently, a rhodamine-conjugated chicken anti-goat IgG was used as the secondary antibody (1:100). After this procedure, the rabbit polyclonal IgG-insulin antibody was added (1:300, cat. sc-9168; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Finally, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse anti-rabbit IgG (cat. sc-2353; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) was used as the secondary antibody (1:100), and the slides were observed with a confocal microscope (TCS-SP5; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with oil immersion 40x objective. FITC was excited with 488 nm wavelength, and the emitted light was bandpassed through the photomultiplier tube (PMT) (FITC, 500–535 nm), while rhodamine was excited with 543 nm wavelength, and the emitted light was bandpassed through the PMT (rhodamine, 550–700 nm). Confocal images were viewed and processed by Leica Microsystems. Examination of negative controls was performed to confirm the absence of nonspecific immunofluorescent staining, cross-immunostaining, or fluorescence bleed-through. Negative control was performed in pancreatic tissue without the addition of primary antiserum or the secondary antibody.
Statistical analyses
All data were expressed as the mean±S.D. Differences between groups were found using ANOVA. The differences were considered significant when P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In order to assess hormonal status, testosterone was measured in the serum of experimental animals. As expected, testosterone was almost undetectable in castrated rats (group 2), while it was significantly higher in substituted animals (groups 3–5) compared with controls (Fig. 1A).
|
In order to study the possible effect of testosterone on EG-VEGF gene expression, quantitative PCR was performed in both the in vivo and in vitro models. In pancreatic tissue, testosterone substitution provoked a significant reduction in the EG-VEGF gene expression compared with intact animals (Fig. 1B). In the in vitro model, testosterone treatment (1x10–10–1x10–8 M) significantly reduced EG-VEGF mRNA, in a similar manner to the in vivo model. Flutamide addition to the culture media reverted this effect, increasing EG-VEGF mRNA to control levels (Fig. 2).
|
In all rat groups, positive staining for EG-VEGF was localized. The label was preferentially visualized in pancreatic islets and endothelial cells of blood vessels (Fig. 3A and B respectively). An ovarian section was used as positive control, and primary follicles showed higher staining in the granulosacells (Fig. 3C), as described previously (Fraser et al. 2005, Kisliouk et al. 2005). No immunolabeling was found in negative controls (Fig. 3D). Double immunohistochemistry staining in cultured RINm5F cells was performed in order to assess coexpression of EG-VEGF and insulin. Results demonstrated that not every cell expressed EG-VEGF and insulin; only sporadic immunoreactivity was found. EG-VEGF is shown in Fig. 3E and G with rhodamine label (red), insulin is shown as green staining in Fig. 3F and G, and co-localization of both insulin and EG-VEGF in yellow in Fig. 3G.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Büchler P, Reber HA, Lavey RS, Tomlinson J, Büchler MW, Friess H & Hines OJ 2004 Tumor hypoxia correlates with metastatic tumor growth of pancreatic cancer in an orthotopic murine model. Journal of Surgical Research 120 295–303.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Couvelard A, O'Toole D, Leek R, Turley H, Sauvanet A, Degott C, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J, Harris AL, Gatter K et al. 2005 Expression of hypoxia-inducible factors is correlated with the presence of a fibrotic focus and angiogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Histopathology 46 668–676.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Díaz-Sánchez V, Morimoto S, Morales A, Robles-Díaz G & Cerbón M 1995 Androgen receptor in the rat pancreas: genetic expression and steroid regulation. Pancreas 11 241–245.[Web of Science][Medline]
Dorsch M, Qiu Y, Soler D, Frank N, Duong T, Goodearl A, O'Neil S, Lora J & Fraser CC 2005 PKI/EG-VEGF induces monocyte differentiation and activation. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 78 426–434.
Fernández-del Castillo C, Díaz-Sánchez V, Varela-Fascinetto G, Altamirano A, Odor-Morales A, López-Medrano RM & Díaz-Robles G 1991 Testosterone biotransformation by the isolated perfused canine pancreas. Pancreas 6 104–111.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ferrara N, LeCouter J, Lin R & Peale F 2004 EG-VEGF and Bv8: a novel family of tissue restricted angiogenic factors. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1654 69–78.[Medline]
Fraser HM, Bell J, Wilson H, Taylor PD, Morgan K, Anderson RA & Duncan WC 2005 Localization and quantification of cyclic changes in the expression of endocrine gland vascular endothelial growth factor in the human corpus luteum. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 90 427–434.
Ganepola GA, Gritsman AY, Asimakopulos N & Yiengpruksawan A 1999 Are pancreatic tumors hormone dependent? A case report of unusual, rapidly growing pancreatic tumor during pregnancy, its possible relationship to female sex hormones and review of the literature. American Surgeon 65 105–111.[Web of Science][Medline]
Goi T, Fujioka M, Satoh Y, Tabata S, Koneri K, Nagano H, Hirono Y, Katayama K, Hirose K & Yamaguchi A 2004 Angiogenesis and tumor proliferation/metastasis of human colorectal cancer cell line SW620 trasfected with endocrine gland-derived-vascular endothelial growth factor, as a new angiogenic factor. Cancer Research 15 1906–1910.
Hidalgo Pascual M, Ferrero Herrero E, Castillo Fé MJ, Guadarrama González FJ, Peláez Torres P & Botella Ballesteros F 2004 Epidemiology and diagnosis of the pancreatic cancer. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas 96 714–722.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kaser A, Winklmayr M, Lepperdinger G & Kreil G 2003 The AVIT protein family: secreted cysteine-rich vertebrate proteins with diverse functions. EMBO Reports 4 469–473.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kisliouk T, Podlovni H & Meidan R 2005 Unique expression and regulatory mechanisms of EG-VEGF/prokineticin-1 and its receptors in the corpus luteum. Annals of Anatomy 187 529–537.[Medline]
Konduri S, Schwarz MA, Cafasso D & Schwarz RE 2007 Androgen receptor blockade in experimental combination therapy of pancreatic cancer. Journal of Surgical Research 142 378–386.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Koong AC, Mehta VK, Le QT, Fisher GA, Terris DJ, Brown JM, Bastidas AJ & Vierra M 2000 Pancreatic tumors show high levels of hypoxia. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 48 919–922.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Koyama Y, Kiyo-oka M, Osakada M, Horiguchi N, Shintani N, Ago Y, Kakuda M, Baba A & Matsuda T 2006 Expression of prokineticin receptors in mouse cultured astrocytes and involvement in cell proliferation. Brain Research 27 65–69.
LeCouter J & Ferrara N 2002 EG-VEGF and the concept of tissue-specific angiogenic growth factors. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 13 3–8.[CrossRef]
LeCouter J, Kowalski J, Foster J, Hass Phill, Zhang Z, Dillard-Telm L, Frantz G, Rangell L, DeGuzman L, Keller G et al. 2001 Identification of an angiogenic mitogen selective for endocrine gland endothelium. Nature 201 877–884.
LeCouter J, Zlot C, Tejeda M, Peale F & Ferrara N 2004 Bv8 and endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor stimulate hematopoiesis and hematopoietic cell mobilization. PNAS 101 16813–16818.
Lygidakis NJ, Jain S, Sacchi M & Vrachnos P 2005 Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: past, present and future. Hepatogastroenterology 52 1281–1292.[Medline]
Morales A, Cuellar A, Ramirez J, Vilchis F & Diaz-Sanchez V 1999 Synthesis of steroids in pancreas: evidence of cytochrome P-450scc activity. Pancreas 19 39–44.[Web of Science][Medline]
Morales A, Vilchis F, Chávez B, Chan C, Robles-Díaz G & Díaz-Sánchez V 2006 Expression of steroidogenic factors 1 and 2 in normal human pancreas. Journal of Steroid Biochemical Molecular Biology 98 254–258.[CrossRef]
Morales A, Vilchis F, Chávez B, Chan C, Robles-Díaz G & Díaz-Sánchez V 2007a Expression of EG-VEGF in normal human pancreas and adenocarcinoma pancreatic. Journal of Steroid Biochemical Molecular Biology 107 31–40.
Morales-Miranda A, Robles-Díaz G & Díaz-Sánchez V 2007b Steroid hormones and pancreas: a new paradigm. Revista de Investigación Clínica 59 124–129.[Web of Science][Medline]
Morimoto S, Fernandez-Mejia C, Romero-Navarro G, Morales-Peza N & Diaz-Sanchez V 2001 Testosterone effect on insulin content, messenger ribonucleic acid levels, promoter activity and secretion in the rat. Endocrinology 142 1442–1447.
Negi SS, Agarwal A & Chaudhary A 2006 Flutamide in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Investigational New Drugs 24 189–194.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ngan ES, Lee KY, Sit FY, Poon HC, Chan JK, Sham MH, Lui VC & Tam PK 2007a Prokineticin-1 modulates proliferation and differentiation of enteric neural crest cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1773 536–545.[Medline]
Ngan ES, Sit FY, Lee K, Miao X, Yuan Z, Wang W, Nicholls JM, Wong KK, Garcia-Barcelo M, Luis VC et al. 2007b Implications of endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor/prokineticin-1 signaling in human neuroblastoma progression. Clinical Cancer Research 13 868–875.
Pasquali D, Rossi V, Staibano S, De Rosa G, Chieffi P, Prezioso D, Mirone V, Mascolo M, Tramontano D, Bellastella A et al. 2006 The endocrine-gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (EG-VEGF)/prokineticin 1 and 2 and receptor expression in human prostate: up-regulation of EG-VEGF/prokineticin 1 with malignancy. Endocrinology 147 4245–4251.
Robles-Díaz G & Duarte-Rojo A 2001 Pancreas: a sex steroid-dependent tissue. Israel Medical Association Journal 3 364–368.[Web of Science][Medline]
Soga T, Matsumoto S, Oda T, Saito T, Hiyama H, Takasaki J, Kamohara M, Ohishi T, Matsushime H & Furuichi K 2002 Molecular cloning and characterization of prokineticin receptors. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1579 173–179.[Medline]
Zhang L, Yang N, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Mohamed-Hadley A, Fracchioli S, Schlienger K, Toll A, Levine B, Rubin SC et al. 2003 Expression of endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research 9 264–272.
Received in final form 7 February 2008
Accepted 20 February 2008
Made available online as an Accepted Preprint 20 February 2008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |