JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1983) 98, 411-421    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0980411
© 1983 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, J. E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, J. E. A.

Influence of the characteristics of pulses of gonadotrophin releasing hormone on the dynamics of luteinizing hormone release from perifused sheep pituitary cells

R. P. McIntosh and J. E. A. McIntosh

The effects were studied of varying the frequency, width and amplitude of pulses of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) on the release of LH from anterior pituitary cells. Dispersed sheep cells supported in Sephadex were perifused with medium for 10 h and stimulated with different constant pulse patterns of GnRH. The timing of release of LH was measured by radioimmunoassay of the effluent fractions. Pulses of GnRH ranging in duration from 2 min every 8 min to 16 min every 128 min, and in concentration from 1·7 pmol/l to 250 nmol/l were applied to the cells, as well as continuous stimulation. Comparisons of differences between LH release patterns among samples of the same preparation of cells were used to demonstrate the effects of different GnRH stimulatory regimes. It was concluded that (1) the frequency of GnRH stimulation was important to the nature of LH release (periods shorter than about 16 min between pulses reduced LH output and caused faster desensitization of response), (2) the pulse width of GnRH input was important (the rising edge of the pulse produced greater LH output per unit of GnRH input than did continued application of GnRH within a pulse and wider pulses combined with shorter periods reduced LH output) and (3) over a threshold value of 5–10 nmol GnRH/1 pulse amplitude had little further influence on LH output or rate of desensitization in dispersed cells. These findings reinforce the hypothesis that the rising edge of the GnRH pulse is the major stimulant to LH release.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. J. Hayes, D. J. McNicholl, D. Schoenfeld, E. E. Marsh, and J. E. Hall
Free {alpha}-Subunit Is Superior to Luteinizing Hormone as a Marker of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Despite Desensitization at Fast Pulse Frequencies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 1999; 84(3): 1028 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Heinze, R. W. Keener, and A. R. Midgley Jr.
A mathematical model of luteinizing hormone release from ovine pituitary cells in perifusion
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 1998; 275(6): E1061 - E1071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Meredith,, F. W. Turek,, and J. E. Levine
Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Frequency Modulation on the Reproductive Axis of Photoinhibited Male Siberian Hamsters
Biol Reprod, October 1, 1998; 59(4): 813 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for Endocrinology.