JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1982) 94, 91-98    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0940091
© 1982 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franks, S.
Right arrow Articles by Naftolin, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franks, S.
Right arrow Articles by Naftolin, F.

Comparative pharmacology of oestrogens and catechol oestrogens: actions on the immature rat uterus in vivo and in vitro

S. Franks, N. J. MacLusky and F. Naftolin

The effects of primary and catechol oestrogens on the uterus of the immature rat were compared. Because differences between the in-vivo and in-vitro oestrogenic actions of catechol oestrogens on the secretion of LH had been observed, their effects on a peripheral target organ, the uterus, were examined under similar conditions. In-vivo effects were assessed by measurement of uterine weight, induction of uterine cytoplasmic progestogen receptors, and by histological examination. In-vitro actions were determined by measurement of oestrogen-specific induced protein. It was found that the uterotrophic effects in vivo of 4-hydroxyoestradiol were indistinguishable from those of oestradiol whereas 2-hydroxyoestradiol was only weakly oestrogenic and 2-hydroxyoestrone had no effect. However, in vitro, 2-hydroxyoestradiol was as effective as 4-hydroxyoestradiol or oestradiol in stimulating synthesis of uterine induced protein, and 2-hydroxyoestrone, although less potent than oestradiol, had a significant effect. These results were consistent with the observed effects on the secretion of LH. The differences between in-vivo and in-vitro uterotrophic properties of catechol oestrogens can be explained on the basis of known pharmacokinetic factors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
S. Kato, A. Sadarangani, S. Lange, M. Villalon, J. Branes, J. J Brosens, G. I Owen, and M. Cuello
The oestrogen metabolite 2-methoxyoestradiol alone or in combination with tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand mediates apoptosis in cancerous but not healthy cells of the human endometrium
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 351 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. T. Mannisto and S. Kaakkola
Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, and Clinical Efficacy of the New Selective COMT Inhibitors
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 51(4): 593 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Society for Endocrinology.