JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1967) 38, 199-200    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0380199
© 1967 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REITER, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by REITER, R. J.

FAILURE OF THE PINEAL GLAND TO PREVENT GONADOTROPHIN-INDUCED OVARIAN STIMULATION IN BLINDED HAMSTERS

R. J. REITER

There are indications that, at least in blinded hamsters or in hamsters exposed to short daily photoperiods, the pineal gland may secrete a gonadotrophin-inhibiting substance (Hoffman & Reiter, 1965a; Reiter, Hoffman & Hester, 1966a, b). The ovarian and testicular atrophy which ensues after hamsters are blinded is prevented by surgical removal of the pineal gland. Although several workers have speculated on the mechanism by which pineal substances produce the inhibitory effect, the problem remains unsolved (Moszkowska, 1965; Reiter & Hester, 1966). The present results show that the inhibitory substance of pineal origin neither inhibits completely the action of exogenous gonadotrophins on the ovary nor the action of oestrogen on the uterus.

Thirty young adult female hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were divided into 4 groups: (1) untreated controls; (2) animals subjected to bilateral optic enucleation (blinding); (3) hamsters that were both enucleated and pinealectomized; (4) blinded hamsters that were injected







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the Society for Endocrinology.