JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1967) 37, 83-92    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0370083
© 1967 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARPER, M. J. K.
Right arrow Articles by WALPOLE, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HARPER, M. J. K.
Right arrow Articles by WALPOLE, A. L.

MODE OF ACTION OF I.C.I. 46,474 IN PREVENTING IMPLANTATION IN RATS

M. J. K. HARPER and A. L. WALPOLE

Trans-1-(p-β-dimethylaminoethoxyphenyl)-1,2-diphenylbut-1-ene (I.C.I. 46,474), given by mouth, was most effective in terminating early pregnancy in rats on the fourth day after mating. A single intravenous dose was effective on day 4 but even early on day 5 large doses had little effect.

A single oral dose on day 1 or 2 sufficient to prevent implantation completely, caused accelerated tubal transport of the eggs and their premature expulsion from the uterus. This was partially blocked by progesterone and appears to be an oestrogenic effect. The corresponding dose on day 3 or 4 did not affect egg transport or development. After giving the compound on day 4, substantial but diminishing numbers of unimplanted eggs were recovered from the uterus up to day 11 of 'pregnancy'. Such blastocysts could be induced to implant in a proportion of rats by giving a single large injection of oestrogen at the same time as the compound (on day 4) or a progressively smaller dose up to day 11.

These results support the hypothesis (Harper & Walpole, 1966) that I.C.I. 46,474 can prevent implantation in rats by counteracting the 'oestrogensurge' on day 4 necessary for its induction. They further suggest that the compound persists for some days in the uterus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. C. Jordan
Tamoxifen or Raloxifene for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Tale of Two Choices Point
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2207 - 2209.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Y. Zeng, M. Yokohira, K. Saoo, H. Takeuchi, Y. Chen, K. Yamakawa, Y. Matsuda, Y. Kakehi, and K. Imaida
Inhibition of prostate carcinogenesis in probasin/SV40 T antigen transgenic rats by raloxifene, an antiestrogen with anti-androgen action, but not nimesulide, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1109 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. V. Jensen and V. C. Jordan
The Estrogen Receptor: A Model for Molecular Medicine
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 1980 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
J. I. Macgregor and V. C. Jordan
Basic Guide to the Mechanisms of Antiestrogen Action
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 1998; 50(2): 151 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
J. D. Sherman
Tamoxifen and Prevention of Breast Cancer
Toxicology and Industrial Health, January 1, 1998; 14(4): 485 - 499.
[PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the Society for Endocrinology.