JOE
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (2008) 197, 531-542    DOI: 10.1677/JOE-08-0055
© 2008 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dupont, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dupont, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J.

Insulin immuno-neutralization in chicken: effects on insulin signaling and gene expression in liver and muscle

Joëlle Dupont1, Sophie Tesseraud2, Michel Derouet2, Anne Collin2, Nicole Rideau2, Sabine Crochet2, Estelle Godet2, Estelle Cailleau-Audouin2, Sonia Métayer-Coustard2, Michel J Duclos2, Christian Gespach3, Tom E Porter4, Larry A Cogburn5 and Jean Simon2

1 PRC (UMR 6175)2 Station de Recherches Avicoles (UR 83), INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France3 INSERM, U673 and Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75571 Paris, Cedex 12, France4 Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, 1403 Animal Sciences, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA5 Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, 036 Townsend Hall, Newark, Delaware 19717-1303, USA

(Correspondence should be addressed to J Simon; Email: simon{at}tours.inra.fr)

In order to evaluate the role of insulin in chicken, an insulin immuno-neutralization was performed. Fed chickens received 1 or 3 i.v. injections of anti-insulin serum (2-h intervals), while fed or fasted controls received normal serum. Measurements included insulin signaling cascade (at 1 h in liver and muscle), metabolic or endocrine plasma parameters (at 1 and 5 h), and qRT-PCR analysis (at 5 h) of 23 genes involved in endocrine regulation, metabolisms, and transcription. Most plasma parameters and food intake were altered by insulin privation as early as 1 h and largely at 5 h. The initial steps of insulin signaling pathways including insulin receptor (IR), IR substrate-1 (IRS-1), and Src homology collagen and downstream elements: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), Akt, GSK3, ERK2, and S6 ribosomal protein) were accordingly turned off in the liver. In the muscle, IR, IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, and PI3K activity remained unchanged, whereas several subsequent steps were altered by insulin privation. In both tissues, AMPK was not altered. In the liver, insulin privation decreased Egr1, PPAR{gamma}, SREBP1, THRSP{alpha} (spot14), D2-deiodinase, glucokinase (GK), and fatty acid synthase (whereas D3-deiodinase and IGF-binding protein1 transcripts were up-regulated. Liver SREBP1 and GK and plasma IGFBP1 proteins were accordingly down- and up-regulated. In the muscle, PPARβ{delta} and atrogin-1 mRNA increased and Egr1 mRNA decreased. Changes in messengers were partly mimicked by fasting. Thus, insulin signaling in muscle is peculiar in chicken and is strictly dependent on insulin in fed status. The ‘diabetic’ status induced by insulin immuno-neutralization is accompanied by impairments of glucagon secretion, thyroid axis, and expression of several genes involved in regulatory pathways or metabolisms, evidencing pleiotropic effects of insulin in fed chicken.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Endocrinology.