HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fu, X. Articles by Porter, T. E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fu, X. Articles by Porter, T. E

Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
¹ Department of Animal and Marine Bioresource Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka-shi 812–8581, Japan
² Molecular and Cell Biology Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to T E Porter; Email: TEPorter{at}umd.edu)

It is generally accepted that, in mammals, lactotrophs differentiate from somatotrophs through an intermediate cell type, the mammosomatotroph. However, little information exists about mammosomatotrophs and their relationship with lactotroph development in non-mammalian vertebrates. We reported previously that corticosterone (CORT) can induce both somatotroph and lactotroph differentiation in cultures of chicken embryonic pituitary cells. Our current objectives were to determine the abundance of mammosomatotrophs during chicken pituitary development, to identify mammosomatotrophs during CORT induction of lactotrophs, and to explore whether lactotrophs induced by CORT are derived from somatotrophs. Cells that produced prolactin (PRL) only, growth hormone (GH) only or both hormones simultaneously were detected by three approaches – dual immunofluorescence, a combination of immunofluorescence and immunocytochemistry (ICC), and by ICC using combinations of antibodies to GH and PRL. Mammosomatotrophs were not detected between embryonic day (E) 16 and E20, even though lactotrophs increased from nearly absent to greater than 10% of all pituitary cells during this period. CORT induced more than 10% of all E13 pituitary cells to produce PRL, while the percentage of mammosomatotrophs remained at less than 1% of all cells. When cells from the cephalic and caudal lobes of the anterior pituitary were treated separately, CORT increased GH cells in cultures from the caudal lobe. No PRL cells were found in the caudal lobe. In the cephalic lobe, CORT increased lactotrophs, while GH cells were barely detected. In summary, mammosomatotrophs are rare during chicken pituitary development, and CORT does not induce lactotrophs from somatotrophs. These findings indicate that, unlike in mammals, lactotrophs do not differentiate from somatotrophs during chicken embryonic development.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Ogasawara, H. Nogami, M. C. Tsuda, J.-A. Gustafsson, K. S. Korach, S. Ogawa, T. Harigaya, and S. Hisano Hormonal Regulation of Prolactin Cell Development in the Fetal Pituitary Gland of the Mouse Endocrinology, February 1, 2009; 150(2): 1061 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Leclerc, D. Zadworny, G. Bedecarrats, and U. Kuhnlein Ontogenesis of the Expression of Prolactin Receptor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid During Late Embryogenesis in Turkeys and Chickens Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1174 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-L. Baudet, B. Martin, Z. Hassanali, E. Parker, E. J. Sanders, and S. Harvey Expression, Translation, and Localization of a Novel, Small Growth Hormone Variant Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 103 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]