JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1770399

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hamel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hamel, F.
Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 177, Issue 3, 399-405
Copyright © 2003 by Society for Endocrinology


Articles

Insulin inhibition of the proteasome is dependent on degradation of insulin by insulin-degrading enzyme

RG Bennett, J Fawcett, MC Kruer, WC Duckworth, and FG Hamel


A consequence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is the loss of lean muscle mass as a result of accelerated proteolysis by the proteasome. Insulin inhibition of proteasomal activity requires interaction with insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), but it is unclear if proteasome inhibition is dependent merely on insulin-NIDE binding or if degradation of insulin by IDE is required. To test the hypothesis that degradation by IDE is required for proteasome inhibition, a panel of insulin analogues with variable susceptibility to degradation by IDE binding was used to assess effects on the proteasome. The analogues used were [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-insulin (lispro), [Asp(B10)]-insulin (Asp(B10)) and [Glu(B4), Gln(B16), Phe(B17)]-insulin (EQF). Lispro was as effective as insulin at inhibition of degradation of iodine-125 ((125)I)-labeled insulin, but Asp(B10) and EQF were somewhat more effective. All agents inhibited cross-linking of (125)I-insulin to IDE, suggesting that all were capable of IDE binding. In contrast, although insulin and lispro were readily degraded by IDE, Asp(B10) was degraded more slowly, and EQF degradation was undetectable. Both insulin and lispro inhibited the proteasome, but Asp(B10) was less effective, and EQF had little effect. In summary, despite effective IDE binding, EQF was poorly degraded by IDE, and was ineffective at proteasome inhibition. These data suggest that insulin inhibition of proteasome activity is dependent on degradation by IDE. The mechanism of proteasome inhibition may be the generation of inhibitory fragments of insulin, or by displacement of IDE from the proteasome.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. R. LaPensee, E. R. Hugo, and N. Ben-Jonathan
Insulin Stimulates Interleukin-6 Expression and Release in LS14 Human Adipocytes through Multiple Signaling Pathways
Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5415 - 5422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for Endocrinology.