JOE Cross-Journal Searching
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1690587

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, G.
Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 169, Issue 3, 587-593
Copyright © 2001 by Society for Endocrinology


Articles

Subcellular distribution and glycosylation pattern of androgen receptor from sheep omental adipose tissue

JP McCann, JS Mayes, GR Hendricks, JB Harjo, and GH Watson


Sex steroids are known to have an influence on the distribution, metabolism and accretion of adipose tissue. These steroids carry out their function via specific receptors. We have previously reported the presence of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in sheep adipose tissues. In this study, we have tested the subcellular distribution of androgen receptor (AR) in sheep omental adipose tissue. Subcellular fractions - microsomes, plasma membrane and nuclei-cell debris - were isolated by differential and sucrose gradient centrifugation and confirmed by electron microscopy. The AR was determined in each fraction by Western blot analyses. As anticipated, the receptor was found in the cytosolic fraction, but a high concentration was also present in the microsomal fraction, a lesser amount in the plasma membrane fraction, and only a small amount was left in the nuclei-cell debris fraction. Two minor immunostaining bands with approximate molecular weights of 250 and 140 kDa and a major band at 110 kDa were detected in the cytosolic fraction, but only the 110 kDa band was detected in the membrane fractions. A 104 kDa band was observed on occasion and believed to be a degradation product. The cytosolic isoforms were tested for sensitivity to glycosidases. This treatment resulted in a decrease in the amount of the 250 and 140 kDa bands. To substantiate that the 250 and 140 kDa isoforms were glycoproteins, the cytosolic fraction was chromatographed on Concanavalin A-Sepharose. The 110 kDa band was eluted in the 0.4 M KCl salt wash while the 250 and 140 kDa bands were eluted with alpha-methylmannoside. Treatment of the glycoprotein (alpha-methylmannoside) peak with glycosidases converted the 250 and 140 kDa bands to the 110 kDa band. These data confirm the presence of AR in subcellular fractions of adipose tissue and suggest that it exists in various glycosylated isoforms.





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society for Endocrinology.