HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Evans, M J Articles by Donald, R A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Evans, M J Articles by Donald, R A

Perifused equine anterior pituitary cells were used to investigate the relationships between the secretion of ACTH and substances known to either stimulate (corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH), and arginine vasopressin (AVP)) or inhibit (cortisol) ACTH secretion. The experiments were designed to mimic the hormone milieu present in vivo in the horse, with cortisol (0 or 100 nmol/l) and CRH (0 or 0·02 nmol/l) perifused continuously, and pulses of AVP (10 nmol/l) applied for 5 min at 30-min intervals.

In columns perifused with 0·02 nmol CRH/1 there was no significant overall effect of 100 nmol cortisol/l on the ACTH responses to pulses of AVP, although there was a significant interaction between AVP pulse number and cortisol showing that ACTH total area (pmol ACTH proportional to area under response curve) in response to AVP pulses 1 and 2 was significantly (P<0·05) decreased in columns perifused with 100 nmol cortisol/l. However ACTH incremental area (pmol ACTH proportional to the area above the CRH-induced baseline) was not affected by cortisol at any AVP pulse.

This contrasts with the effect of cortisol in columns perifused with 0 nmol CRH/l, where 100 nmol cortisol/l significantly decreased ACTH total area (P=0·0075) and incremental area (P=0·049) at all AVP pulses compared with the responses in columns receiving 0 nmol cortisol/l.

There was a fall off in ACTH responsiveness with time during the experiment which, in the presence of 0·02 nmol CRH/1, was significantly (P<0·001) greater with 0 nmol cortisol/l than with 100 nmol cortisol/l and if 6 (rather than 3) pulses of AVP were given, whereas with 0 nmol CRH/l there was no difference in the fall off with time between columns receiving 0 and 100 nmol cortisol/l.

These results show that the control of ACTH secretion is influenced not only by independent action of secretagogues such as CRH and AVP, or inhibitors such as cortisol, but by a complex interaction of these factors with one another. CRH may have a role in 'protecting' the ACTH response to pulses of AVP in the presence of cortisol. It follows that, in vivo, 'background' CRH could allow an increase in ACTH in response to AVP released by a new stress, despite the presence of elevated cortisol.

Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 148, 475–483

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Hassan and D Mason Mechanisms of desensitization of the adrenocorticotropin response to arginine vasopressin in ovine anterior pituitary cells J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 29 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Vozarova, C. Weyer, S. Snitker, J.-F. Gautier, G. Cizza, G. Chrousos, E. Ravussin, and P. A. Tataranni Effect of Cortisol on Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Pima Indians and Caucasians J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2003; 88(7): 3218 - 3226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]