HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cabanillas, A M Articles by Coleoni, A H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cabanillas, A M Articles by Coleoni, A H

The present work was addressed to study a possible relationship between monoamine oxidase (MAO) and the thyroid iodide transport mechanism.

Normal rats treated with clorgyline (a selective MAO-A inhibitor) or tranylcypromine (a non-selective MAO inhibitor) showed a significantly diminished thyroid MAO activity, while deprenyl and pargyline (MAO-B inhibitors) did not modify the thyroidal enzyme activity with respect to the control group. Under these conditions, in vivo iodide transport was reduced both by clorgyline and tranylcypromine administration whereas it remained unchanged after treatment with MAO-B inhibitors.

The effect of MAO inhibitors on thyroid MAO activity and in vivo iodide transport was also evaluated in rats treated with exogenous thyrotrophin (TSH) after endogenous TSH secretion blockade produced by T₄ administration. In this condition, thyroid MAO activity was significantly lowered by clorgyline and was not modified by deprenyl. In contrast to the results observed in normal rats, in vivo iodide transport in TSH-treated rats remained unaltered after treatment either with clorgyline or deprenyl.

MAO activity evaluated in bovine thyroid follicles in primary culture was highly sensitive to low concentrations of clorgyline (<10 nmol/l) and relatively insensitive to deprenyl, a finding that indicates a predominance of the MAO-A isoform in the follicular cells in culture. When clorgyline (0·1 and 1 µmol/l) or deprenyl (1 µmol/l) were added to the culture medium, no modifications in the active transport of iodide were observed.

These results indicate the absence of a direct linkage between thyroid MAO activity and the active iodide transport. MAO inhibitors (particularly MAO-A inhibitors) do not appear to be responsible for an in vivo diminished thyroid iodide uptake through a direct action on the iodide transport mechanism. An indirect effect of MAO-A inhibitors on thyroid iodide transport mediated by the accumulation of monoamines in neuroendocrine areas involved in TSH regulation is suggested.

Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 143, 303–308