|
|
||||||||
Follicle-stimulating hormone is known to be highly heterogeneous in serum and in the pituitary. In the present study, we have partially separated different molecular species of human pituitary FSH and characterized their immunoreactivity and in vitro bioactivity. Pooled extracts of male (n=15) and female (n=9) human pituitary glands were chromatographed on a column of Sephacryl S-200 and FSH-containing fractions were fractionated by chromatofocusing in the pH range 4–6. FSH was measured in the individual fractions by an in vitro bioassay, based on the FSH-dependent aromatase activity of immature rat Sertoli cells, and by the following methods based on commercial kits: radioimmunoassay (RIA), immunofluorimetric assay (IFMA), immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), immunoenzymometric assay (IEMA). In each assay, the kit standard, calibrated against the 2nd International Reference Preparation (IRP) 78/549, and the International Standard (IS) 83/575 were run in parallel. The relative potencies of the kit standards in terms of IS 83/575 were: IFMA 3·08, IRMA 1·62, RIA 2·42, IEMA 1·45 and bioassay 1·14. After chromatofocusing, pituitary FSH eluted mostly in fractions with pH
4·5, without sex-related differences. In both sexes
25% of bioactive material showed a pI<4 and eluted with 1 M NaCl. Although the same IS 83/575 was used in the various assays, the profiles of immunoreactive FSH were significantly different. The highest intermethod variability was observed in the case of male pituitary FSH. The relative biopotency of the different molecular species of FSH did not appear to change according to their pI but, rather, varied with the assay method and the standard. In terms of 2nd IRP 78/549 the activity profiles were similar but not identical to those obtained in terms of IS 83/575 and the ratios between the two values (IS:IRP ratios) were significantly different among the methods. No significant correlation was found between IS:IRP ratios and FSH concentrations or pH. These data suggest that: (1) all the methods have different affinities for standard and unknown and/or for different molecular isoforms of FSH; (2) overall, they perform more accurately when assaying female pituitary FSH, perhaps because of a closer resemblance between standard and unknown; (3) the variability of the IS:IRP ratios indicates a different affinity of the antibodies for IS 83/575 and the kit standard, highlighting the importance of the molecular composition of the reference preparations for the final result; and (4) the results do not support the commonly accepted concept of a higher in vitro biopotency of less acidic species of pituitary FSH.
Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 141, 359–367
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Zarinan, A. Olivares, D. Soderlund, J.P. Mendez, and A. Ulloa-Aguirre Changes in the biological:immunological ratio of basal and GnRH-releasable FSH during the follicular, pre-ovulatory and luteal phases of the human menstrual cycle Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1611 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ulloa-Aguirre, C. Timossi, and J.P. Mendez Is there any physiological role for gonadotrophin oligosaccharide heterogeneity in humans?: I. Gondatrophins are synthesized and released in multiple molecular forms. A matter of fact Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 599 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Olivares, M. Cardenas, C. Timossi, T. Zarinan, V. Diaz-Sanchez, and A. Ulloa-Aguirre Reactivity of different LH and FSH standards and preparations in the World Health Organization matched reagents for enzyme-linked immunoassays of gonadotrophins Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2285 - 2291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Rose, R. E. Gaines Das, and A. H. Balen Definition and Measurement of Follicle Stimulating Hormone Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2000; 21(1): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Simoni, J. Gromoll, and E. Nieschlag The Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor: Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Pathophysiology Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1997; 18(6): 739 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |